Thursday, October 8, 2020

Masonic Symbols and the Mormon Temple

See Table Of Contents

PLEASE SUPPORT ME 
https://www.patreon.com/VincentBruno

http://www.utlm.org/onlineresources/masonicsymbolsandtheldstemple.htm

Masonic Symbols and the LDS Temple

By Sandra Tanner

In the Spring of 2002 the LDS Church completed its reconstruction of the Nauvoo Temple in Illinois. It was originally built in the 1840's but was destroyed after the Mormons abandoned the town. Due to the publicity and photos regarding this new temple many people have asked about the symbols on the building.


To understand the symbols one must first know something of Joseph Smith's involvement with Freemasonry. Joseph's brother, Hyrum, had been a Mason since the 1820's. Many other members of the LDS church, like Brigham Young, were Masons before they joined Mormonism. LDS historian Reed Durham observed:

"By 1840, John Cook Bennett, a former active leader in Masonry had arrived in Commerce [Nauvoo] and rapidly exerted his persuasive leadership in all facets of the Church, including Mormon Masonry. ... Joseph and Sidney [Rigdon] were inducted into formal Masonry...on the same day..." ("Is There No Help for the Widow's Son?" by Dr. Reed C. Durham, Jr., as printed in Joseph Smith and Masonry: No Help for the Widow's Son, Martin Pub. Co., Nauvoo, Ill., 1980, p. 17.)

Reed Durham further commented:

"I have attempted thus far to demonstrate that Masonic influences upon Joseph in the early Church history, preceding his formal membership in Masonry, were significant....In fact, I believe that there are few significant developments in the Church, that occurred after March 15, 1842, which did not have some Masonic interdependence." (Joseph Smith and Masonry: No Help for the Widow's Son, p.17)

The History of the Church records Smith's entrance into the Masonic lodge in 1842:

"Tuesday, 15.—I officiated as grand chaplain at the installation of the Nauvoo Lodge of Free Masons, at the Grove near the Temple. Grand Master Jonas, of Columbus, being present, a large number of people assembled on the occasion. The day was exceedingly fine; all things were done in order, and universal satisfaction was manifested. In the evening I received the first degree in Free Masonry in the Nauvoo Lodge, assembled in my general business office." (History of the Church, by Joseph Smith, Deseret Book, 1978, Vol.4, Ch.32, p.550-1)

The next day Smith recorded:

"Wednesday, March 16.—I was with the Masonic Lodge and rose to the sublime degree." (History of the Church, Vol.4, Ch.32, p.552)

The Mormon involvement in Freemasonry reached its heights during the early 1840's in Nauvoo. In the Encyclopedia of Mormonism we read:

"The introduction of Freemasonry in NAUVOO had both political and religious implications....Eventually nearly 1,500 LDS men became associated with Illinois Freemasonry, including many members of the Church's governing priesthood bodies—this at a time when the total number of non-LDS Masons in Illinois lodges barely reached 150." (Encyclopedia of Mormonism, vol.2, p.527)

The Salt Lake Tribune (May 4, 2002, p.C3) printed a picture of the original Nauvoo temple weather vane, which shows the Masonic symbol of the compass and square above the angel. Reporter Peggy Stack wrote:

"Every detail of the historic Nauvoo Temple was reconstructed [in the new Nauvoo temple] meticulously with one exception: the flying angel weather vane that graced the top of the 19th century Mormon edifice.

"In its place is the gold-leafed Angel Moroni, first used on the Salt Lake Temple,...

"Some speculate that the horizontal angel, with its compass and square, may be too closely associated with Masonic rituals for modern Mormons." (Salt Lake Tribune, May 4, 2002, p.C3)



[Original architect's drawing of the Nauvoo Temple weather vane.
Notice the compass and square above the angel.]

Reed Durham observed:

"There is absolutely no question in my mind that the Mormon ceremony which came to be known as the Endowment, introduced by Joseph Smith to Mormon Masons initially, just a little over one month after he became a Mason, had an immediate inspiration from Masonry....



[Architect's drawing of the stars for the Nauvoo Temple.]


"It is also obvious that the Nauvoo Temple architecture was in part, at least Masonically influenced. Indeed, it appears that there was an intentional attempt to utilize Masonic symbols and motifs. The sun stones, and the moon and star stones, were examples. An additional example was the angel used on the weather vane on the top of the Temple. [Above the angel] is a beautiful compass and square, in the typical Masonic fashion." (Joseph Smith and Masonry: No Help for the Widow's Son, p.18)


[The compass and square as used in Masonry.]

Additional details of the Nauvoo temple symbols and pictures of the building are in the Deseret News 2001-2002 Church Almanac (see pp.120-141). On page 135 of the Almanac is a photograph of one of the original sunstones that were placed at the top of the columns around the outside of the temple. A photo of a sunstone is also in Fawn Brodie's book, No Man Knows My History, p.298(b).



[One of the original sunstones from the Nauvoo Temple.]

The Nauvoo sunstone, with its human face, is similar to the Masonic depictions of the sun. Below is an illustration from the Masonic book, The Craft and Its Symbols, p.75:




Masonic symbols have been pictured and discussed in a number of books. Albert Pike, in his book, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, discusses the various Masonic symbols and their meaning.

In the book The Craft and Its Symbols: Opening the Door to Masonic Symbolism, by Allen E. Roberts, p.11, is a drawing of the Masonic apron presented to President George Washington by Lafayette The symbols on the apron, which were later used by the Mormons, include a beehive, all-seeing eye, compass and square, and the sun, moon and stars.



The Masonic Monitor, in 1820, had an illustration of the symbols of Freemasonry. This drawing is very similar to Washington's apron.



Many Masonic symbols (the sun, moon, stars, all-seeing eye, beehive, hand grip, and the beehive) were also placed on the Salt Lake Temple.

  
(click on each image to enlarge)
[Symbols on the front of the Salt Lake Temple.]

One of the more familiar symbols of Mormonism is the beehive. Examples of pioneer use of the hive can be seen on Brigham Young's home (known as the Beehive House) in Salt Lake City.


[Top of Beehive House]

[Beehive House with Eagle Gate next to it.]

The beehive is also displayed on the doorknobs of the Salt Lake temple.

[One of the brass doorknobs in the
Salt Lake Temple displaying the beehive.]

However, most people are not aware that the beehive was a symbol of Masonry years before Joseph Smith started his church. Masonic historian Allen E. Roberts explains:

"The Bee Hive, Masonically, is an emblem of Industry....When and why the hive of the bee entered Freemasonry as a symbol no one knows....In the book, The Early Masonic Catechisms, the bee in Masonry is mentioned as early as 1724..." (The Craft and Its Symbols, by Allen E. Roberts, Macoy Pub., 1974, p.73)

While many people are aware of the symbols used on the Salt Lake temple, they were also used on other LDS buildings in Utah (see "Where Are All The All-Seeing Eyes?", Sunstone Magazine, vol.10, no.5, May 1985).




LDS researcher Michael Homer discussed the Mormon use of Masonic symbols:

"Even after the turn of the century and the abandonment of polygamy, the same comparison [to Masonry] was made. The First Presidency stated in a message on October 15, 1911, that '[b]ecause of their Masonic characters, the ceremonies of the temple are sacred and not for the public.'

"Mormon use of Masonic symbols has also been publicly acknowledged. Mormons were hardly discreet in their depictions of symbols long associated with Freemasonry...including the square, the compass, the sun, moon, and stars, the beehive, the all-seeing eye, ritualistic hand grips, two interlaced triangles forming a six-pointed star...and a number of other Masonic symbols on endowment houses, temples, cooperatives, grave markers, tabernacles, church meetinghouses, newspaper mastheads, hotels, residences, money, logos, and seals." ("Similarity of Priesthood in Masonry": The Relationship between Freemasonry and Mormonism, by Michael W. Homer, Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, vol.27, no.3, Fall 1994, p.73)





[Even after the Mormons came to Utah,
Brigham Young continued to wear his Masonic pin
displaying the compass and square.]

In addition to these symbols, the LDS Church continues to use the up-side-down, five pointed star. The newly completed Nauvoo Temple has numerous windows using it. For pictures see (off-site links):

The inverted star was also used on the Salt Lake temple above the front doors,



above the upper arched windows on the north and south sides, on the Eagle Gate monument (over State Street and South Temple in Salt Lake City),



on the planter boxes in front of the statue of Christ in the Salt Lake Visitors Center,




and on the front entrance, upper left-hand corner, of the LDS Historical Museum (west of temple square).



While the upside-down star is used in Masonry, it is also used by Satanists.



Also, on the LDS temple undergarment (worn daily by LDS faithful) are embroidered the compass and square. This would look like small zigzag stitching to form a "V" on the left breast and a "L" on the right breast of the garment. There is also a small stitched line at the bellybutton and the right knee. These are on both the men's and the women's underwear. The garment is to be worn daily to remind the Mormon of the covenants made in the temple.

Since the LDS Church rejects the use of the cross as a religious symbol, one is left to wonder why they would adopt symbols used by the Masons and Satanists?

When trying to explain the similarities between Mormonism and Masonry, one LDS author wrote:

"Masons who visit the Temple Block in Salt Lake City are impressed by what they call the Masonic emblems displayed on the outside of the Mormon Temple.

"Yes, the 'Masonic emblems' are displayed on the walls of the Temple—the sun, moon and stars, 'Holiness to the Lord,' the two right hands clasped in fellowship, the All-seeing eye, Alpha and Omega, and the beehive. Masonic writers tell us that the Mormon Temple ritual and their own are slightly similar in some respects.

"Without any apologies we frankly admit that there may be some truth in these statements." (Mormonism and Masonry, Introduction, by E. Cecil McGavin, Bookcraft, 1956)

Later in the same book, Mr. McGavin stated:

"In the diary of Benjamin F. Johnson, an intimate friend and associate of Joseph Smith, it is recorded that 'Joseph told me that Freemasonry was the apostate endowment, as sectarian religion was the apostate religion.' Elder Heber C. Kimball, who had been a Mason for many years, related that after Joseph Smith became a Mason, he explained to his brethren that Masonry had been taken from the priesthood." (Mormonism and Masonry, p.199)

The problem with Mr. McGavin's position is that neither the Masonic or Mormon rituals can be shown to date to King Solomon's temple. In fact, most historians place the beginning of Freemasonry in the 1700's. LDS author Michael Homer wrote:

"Prior to 1860 most Masonic writers accepted the legends of Freemasonry with claimed that it originated in antiquity. Although these claims were challenged by most anti-Masonic writers in the United States,...most Masonic writers refused to discount these claims until 'a school of English investigators' began to evaluate lodge minutes, ancient rituals, and municipal records. Eventually this movement...debunked the notion that the rituals practiced in Speculative Freemasonry originated before the sixteenth century. Gould and others argued that the best evidence indicated that Operative Freemasonry originated with trade guilds in the Middle Ages and that the development of Speculative Freemasonry, with ceremonies and rituals similar to those practiced today, began in the seventeenth century....the rituals of Freemasonry have never been static, but have evolved both in time and place. For example, only post-1760 rituals included separate obligations for degrees in conjunction with signs, penalties, tokens, and words, the form found in most subsequent rituals and the same format followed in the Mormon temple endowment." ("Similarity of Priesthood in Masonry," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, vol.27, no.3, Fall 1994, pp.103-104)

Since Freemasonry dates to the 1700's and Joseph Smith was a Mason before he introduced the LDS temple rituals and built the Nauvoo temple, one is forced to conclude that the similarities between the two groups are due to Smith borrowing elements from Masonry.

For more information see our page: Captain Morgan and the Masonic Influence in Mormonism.

Also see these off-site links:

 

Sunday, July 19, 2020

Similar Freemason symbology in Christians Science and Jehovah's Witnesses



Both Charles Taze Russel's  grave and Mary Baker Eddy's memorial (built by Freemasons) are pyramids and both the Watchtower and Christian Science logo were the popular Freemason symbols of the cross and the crown.



Joseph Smith send an emissary to Israel to facilitate the return of the Jews



Joseph Smith sent an emissary, Orson Hyde, to Israel to facilitate the return of the Jews.

Why are Mormons obsessed with Jews?
Peter Beinart
The Forward
October 23, 2017

And Mormons don’t identify with only the biblical Israelites’ journey to the Promised Land; they identify with the modern Zionist story, too. In the 1830s, decades before Theodor Herzl’s birth, Mormon leader Joseph Smith instructed a disciple named Orson Hyde to “go to Jerusalem, the land of thy fathers, and be a watchman unto the house of Israel” and thus “facilitate the gathering together of that people.” Hyde made it to the Mount of Olives, where he asked God to “Let the land become abundantly fruitful when possessed by its rightful heirs.”

The Book of Mormons strongly hints at pro-Zionism



The Freemason inspired Book of Mormon states that god did not forget his covenant with the Jews and will bring it into being. 

"Book of Mormon expressly condemns anti-Semitism"
By Dan Peterson
Dessert News

"Yea," wrote the prophet Mormon, "and ye need not any longer hiss, nor spurn, nor make game of the Jews, nor of any remnant of the house of Israel; for behold, the Lord remembereth his covenant unto them, and he will do unto them according to that which he hath sworn" (3 Nephi 29:8).

Joseph Smith and the early Mormon Church believed Jews should return to Israel



Joseph Smith and the early Mormon Church believed Jews should return to Israel. 

Why Mormons can’t be anti-Zionists
Jewish Journal 
5 August 2014



At the dedication of our first temple in 1836, Joseph Smith — the first president of the Church — asked that “the children of Judah may begin to return to the lands which thou didst give to Abraham, their father.” In 1844, Joseph Smith and his brother Hyrum were murdered by an Illinois mob. A year later, the leaders of the church issued a “Proclamation to the World.” It said, in part, “The Jews among all nations are commanded to prepare to return to Jerusalem in Palestine, and to rebuild that city to the Lord.  And also to organize and establish their own political government under their own rulers, judges, and governors in that country.”

Christian Scientists believed in the restoration of the physical nation of Israel



Christian Scientists promoted the physical restoration of the nation of Israel. 

RESTORATION AND RENAMING OF ISRAEL
SAMUEL GREENWOOD
From the September 1918 issue of The Christian Science Journal
https://journal.christianscience.com/shared/view/m4533czgak?s=e


 The Historical Sketch, on page 17 of the Manual of The Mother Church, states that "Christian Science, as taught and demonstrated by our Master, casts out error, heals the sick, and restores the lost Israel." This of course means primarily in the spiritual sense, but no more so than in respect to the healing of sickness. The restoration of Israel spiritually could no more be separated, in its effect, from a restored nationality, than could the spiritual healing of the sick be separated from its outward expression in a restored health of body...

...But why, it might be asked, is it necessary for Israel to be brought out of its age-long obscurity and to be reunited nationally with the house of Judah? Why could not things continue indefinitely as they have been, with Israel but a memory, or as an example and warning to wrongdoers? Because this would mean the triumph of the error which led them captive. This question must be understood metaphysically. Nations, like individuals, express types of thought, and it is undoubtedly from this standpoint they are frequently treated by Biblical writers. Israel, as we have seen, stood highest among the nations because it expressed the highest sense of good. Continued adherence to the spiritual truths given to this nation would naturally have resulted in the destruction of error, hence the persistent effort of the carnal mind to seduce Israel by the appeal to sensuality; but though error apparently succeeded, and though it should run the full circle of its false claims, it is only to meet the doom which was pronounced upon it from the very beginning...

...Now Israel, brought back from its long captivity and banishment, and spiritually transformed in the fiery process of error's destruction, is destined to emerge upon a higher plane, not only as a nation, but with a higher consciousness and understanding of Deity. Names meant much to the early Hebrews, and particularly when these names were changed. Writing of Israel restored, Isaiah says, "Thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name." And in Revelation we read, "I will write upon him my new name." Thus we have a new name for both Israel and Israel's God, which brings to mind the prophecy that there shall be "new heavens and a new earth," and the apostle's injunction to "put on the new man." All this definitely indicates that the old order of things is to pass away, and with this passing, which is referred to in Scripture as the end of the times of the Gentiles, the end of matter's domination, there is to come a new sense of all things, and that, it is needless to say, will be the spiritual or divine sense...

...The bringing to light of Israel's identity as a nation would of itself be of little real importance unless Israel had something beyond other nations wherewith to bless the world. The long promised restoration is plainly not for the purpose of exalting one nation above another, but of redeeming humanity. As the prophets evidently foresaw it, the restoration of Israel meant nothing less than the final establishment of Christ's kingdom; not the return of a personal Messiah, but the human perception and demonstration of Truth. Nothing less than this could bring to pass the Scripture, "And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory;" and that other prophecy of Isaiah, "And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it." As this is accomplished all mankind will become Israelites, under the new name of Christian Scientists. It will be remembered that the new name spoken of in Revelation would be known, or acknowledged, only by those receiving it...

...The captivity of Israel did not occur suddenly, but resulted from their gradual departure from the spiritual ideals of the founders of their nation, while the outward captivity, namely, their deportation to a foreign country, extended over a period of many years. So the return of Israel need not be looked for as the event of a day, but as the gradual awakening in human consciousness to know and obey the "God of our fathers," known of old. There is every reason to feel assured that this returning process is already taking place, and to a greater extent than is generally recognized.


All of the Freemason Christian cults reject the Trinity - Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Christian Science


It needs to be noted that each of the Freemason founded Christian churches; Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Christian Science; all of them reject the trinity, which is a minor position in Christianity. This is because Freemasonry rejects the trinity (here) because Freemasonry is a Noahide front (here) and under Noahide Law, Christianity is "idolatry" because they worship Jesus as god (here).

"his so called 'non-Trinitarian' group includes the Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Christadelphians, Apostolics, Christian Scientists, Theosophists, Church of Scientology, Unification Church (Moonies), the Worldwide Church of God and so on." 
- Halsey, A. (13 October 1988). British Social Trends since 1900: A Guide to the Changing Social Structure of Britain. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 518. ISBN 9781349194667. 

Jews were attracted to Freemason Christian Science because it rejects the trinity



According to a Jewess named Anna Friendlich (1869-1941), the reason why so many Jews were attracted to Christian Science is because the philosophy rejected the trinity which she refers to as breaking the first of the 10 commandments against idolatry. This is significant because Freemasonry also rejects the trinity (here) and that is likely because Freemasonry is a self-proclaimed Noahide organization (here). Judaism says that Christianity is idolatry (here) and so a Freemason-Noahide Christianity without the trinity would be attractive to Jews. 


“Israel’s Return to Zion”
Jewish Christian Scientists in the United States, 1880-1925
By Rolf Swensen
Journal Of Religion & Society - Volume 15 (2013)
 Queens College, City University of New York
http://moses.creighton.edu/jrs/2013/2013-19.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3QkSZIOuWzHE9bxhF1KXRKLzKnKZXUnVzEVt3263CBtq8FdLU1byuVJLQ


In February 1905, the Christian Science Journal carried an article entitled “Israel’s Return to Zion” by Anna Friendlich (1869-1941), former Portland, Oregon English teacher, future Christian Science teacher (CSB), and daughter of a Russian-born rabbi. The essay discusses why increasing numbers of American Jews were turning to Christian Science. According to Friendlich, Mary Baker Eddy, the leader of Christian Science, bypassed the standard Christian concept of a three-person Trinity, which enshrined Jesus as divine (in Jewish eyes thus violating the First Commandment), and concentrated on the Truth that existed since the beginning of time and is best expressed in Jesus the Christ. Friendlich exulted that a “Roseate morn dawns on Zion” (680)...

...According to Friendlich, the “Jewish seeker finds in Christian Science an interpretation of the teachings of Jesus which is free from many of the conceptions that have heretofore been so offensive to him.” Friendlich lists four reasons why Jews accepted Christian Science: 1) replacement of a “man-like God” with one made in “His image and likeness;” 2) redefinition of the Trinity as “Life, Truth, and Love,” coupled with the notion that Jesus was not God but instead the “highest manifestation of the Divine nature known to humanity;” 3) belief in the Immaculate Conception and Mary as “heaven-inspired with mighty revelation;” and 4) acceptance of “vicarious atonement” which is only available through the “individual’s own repentance and reformation,” with the life of Jesus as a guide. The third part of her

One of the most compelling reasons for Jews to take up the study of Christian Science was the second plank of Friendlich’s platform: the fact that Eddy did not subscribe to the divinity of Jesus. The concept of Jesus as God had long repelled Jews, who felt this was a violation of the First Commandment, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” Millicent Hyman, daughter of a “deeply religious orthodox Jewess,” wrote, “I thank God with the upmost sincerity for the most gracious gift of Christian Science. It is the impersonal Messiah of Judaism, the fulfillment of Judaism’s every promise” (545, 548). That is, Eddy showed that Jesus best embodied the Christ, or Messiah, available to comfort humanity since the beginning of time.

Saturday, July 18, 2020

Charles Russel, Jehovah's Witness Founder, asked the Rothschilds to establish Israel



The founder of the Jehovah's Witnesses, Charles Russel, has been praised by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for being a Zionist who did not believe in converting Jews. Russel started a Jewish Zionist movement almost 20 years before Herzl established the first Zionist Congress. Russel was so enthusiastic about a Zionist state in Israel that in 1891, while in Jerusalem, he wrote to the philanthropists Baron Maurice de Hirsch and Baron Edmond de Rothschild asking them to use their money to buy land from the Ottoman Empire to begin the process of returning the land of Israel to the Jews. This and much more is explored in this article from Haaretz. 

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium.MAGAZINE-before-herzl-there-was-pastor-russell-a-neglected-chapter-of-zionism-1.6409303

Before Herzl, There Was Pastor Russell: A Neglected Chapter of Zionism
by Philippe Bohstrom

Years before Theodor Herzl proposed creating a Jewish state, Charles Taze Russell was traveling the world holding Jewish Mass Meetings, beginning in 1879, at which he urged Jews to find a national home in Eretz Israel.

“There are now in the world more than ten million Jews, about three-quarters of whom are in Russia, Poland, the Balkan States, and Turkey. If the movement toward Palestine should get the impulse that the Hirsch committee is able to give it, an imaginative person can conceive of the country’s doubling or trebling its Jewish population before the close of our century” (Zion’s Watchtower, 1892, November 1, page 329).

Theodor Herzl published his pamphlet Der Judenstaat in 1896 and, two years later, organized the world’s First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. But in fact the notion of a Jewish state in Palestine had been making the rounds in European and American Christian circles, in various forms. One of its keenest proponents was a Christian preacher and Bible scholar named Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916).

The proposition boldly put forward by Pastor Russell contrasted with the position of many Christian churches at the time, where the feeling was that God’s covenant with the Jews had long since ended and they should convert to Christianity.

The prescient pastor predicted a massive exodus of Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe. Much as he predicted, by 1924 more than 3 million Jews had emigrated from Russia and Eastern Europe. Russell himself did not live long enough to see his prophecy made manifest, dying in 1916.

Russell’s legacy as an enthusiastic, non-proselytizing Zionist, has been acknowledged by none other than the incumbent prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, who said, A recognition of Pastor Russell’s important role as an early American Christian advocate of Zionism is long overdue. The late Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. ambassador to the UN, called Russell a neglected man and chapter in the history of Zionism.

Who was this forgotten father of Zionism, and why would he promote Zionism in the first place?

In the Aftermath of Civil War

In the mid-19th century, when covered wagons still rolled across the open plains carrying settlers to remote sectors of America, when vast herds of buffalo still roamed the range, Charles Taze Russell was born in Allegheny, Pennsylvania on February 16, 1852. He was the second son of Joseph L. and Ann Eliza Russell, both of Scottish-Irish descent.

Russell’s mother died when he was nine years old. At 11, Charles entered a business partnership with his father, the youngster himself writing the articles of agreement under which their enterprise operated. At 15 he and his father were running a flourishing men’s clothing chain with shops in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and more.

Russell’s formative years were coloured by the devastating Civil War that ravaged America from 1861 to 1865, followed by an era of rapid industrialization. In 1869 the first transcontinental railway was completed. Come the 1870’s, the electric light and the telephone came onto the scene. The electric streetcar would arrive in the 1880’s, and by the century’s end, a few automobiles would be noisily proclaiming their presence.

On the intellectual front, Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, described in his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, had for the first time seriously challenged the Roman Catholic Church’s version of history, giving rise to spin-off churches and creeds.

Going Back to Basics

This setting of breakneck development and intellectual progress is where Russell founded the Bible Student Association, which aspired to go back to basics by studying the Bible itself.

Soon a class for systematic Bible Study was formed in Allegheny, Pennsylvania, and in 1879 Charles Taze Russell was elected its pastor. The movement founded Zion’s Watch Tower, the most widely circulated magazine in the world today, according to Business Insider, with an average of 70 million copies a month in 334 languages. For comparison, National Geographic has a circulation of something over 6 million and is published in 25 different languages.

A few years later, in 1881, Russell was elected the first president of the Watchtower Society. Its purpose was to distribute his teachings in the form of tracts.

Russell was a prolific writer, and his major accomplishments include a sixvolume series of systematic theology, “Studies in the Scriptures.” By 1909 this series was one of most widely circulated works in the world, surpassed only by the Bible and The Chinese Almanac.

His crowning achievement at that phase was “The PhotoDrama of Creation,” a groundbreaking innovation that combined sound and color in a motion picture for the first time in history. The film was viewed by more then eight million people, an astronomical success in terms of the times.

In 1909 Russell moved The Watch Tower Society Headquarters to 124 Columbia Heights in Brooklyn Heights. It would remain there until 2016, when Jared Kushner, son-in-law of U.S. President Donald Trump, bought the property.

Early Advocate of Zionism

On August 18, 1891, now in Jerusalem, Russell wrote to the philanthropists Baron Maurice de Hirsch and Baron Edmond de Rothschild, or as he put it, the two leading Hebrews of the world. No less, he put forward a practical plan for Zionism.

It involved purchasing all government-owned land in Palestine, i.e., land not held by private owners, from the impoverished Ottoman Empire. Years later Herzl would make similar proposals. (A copy of the letter is published in Zion’s Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence, December 1891, pages 170-171.)

“As you will see from my books, we find the testimony of the prophets to be, that your nation will be greatly blessed and return to divine favor between now and the year 1915, AD,” Russell wrote. The persecutions that Jews were suffering in Russia were “a mark of divine favor rather than the reverse,” the pastor suggested — and it would only get worse because the Lord’s purpose was to drive the Jews “out of all lands whither he has scattered them.”

To Where?


To Palestine, as apparently indicated by the prophet (Jeremiah 32:37-44, 33:6- 22), Russell explained. Owning not an inch of that land, he had no vested interest, the pastor elaborated, and went on: “My suggestion is that the wealthy Hebrews purchase from Turkey, at a fair valuation, all of her property interest in these lands: i.e., all of the Government lands (lands not held by private owners), under the provision that Syria and Palestine shall be constituted a FREE STATE ...”

In his letter, Russell delicately gibes at alternative “Jewish homeland” ideas touted at the time in places other than Israel, though Baron de Hirsch was actually involved in resettling Jews elsewhere: “But please note, my dear Sir, that the sacred Scriptures predict the return to Palestine, and not a further wandering to the ends of the earth — to America or elsewhere. And, therefore, it is my humble opinion that Israel will find no rest for the sole of his foot until he finds the land of promise; and I pray you, therefore, not to waste your efforts in assisting emigration elsewhere, but concentrate them in the direction where God has indicated success.

We cannot know whether he even replied to Russell, let alone be influenced by him. But a month after Russell’s letter to the barons, on September 11th 1891, Baron Hirsch founded the Jewish Colonization Association to buy land, principally in North and South America but in Palestine too, where agricultural colonies could be established and resettled by Jews who were persecuted in Russia.

Russell’s Yiddish Newspaper 

In 1910 Pastor Russell received a letter from a committee of Jewish leaders: “Dear Sir: Your sympathetic interest in the Jewish people for years past has not escaped our notice. Your denunciation of the atrocities perpetrated against our race in the name of Christianity has added to our conviction that you are a sincere friend,” wrote the committee members.

“Your discourse on Jerusalem and Jewish Hopes has struck a responsive chord in the hearts of many of our people. Still we doubted for a time if any Christian minister could really be interested in a Jew as a Jew and not merely from a hope of proselyting him. You may well understand how surprised we are to find a Christian minister acknowledging that there are prophecies of the Bible still fulfilled, which belong to the Jew and not to the Christian ...

“These things, Pastor Russell, have led to the formation of a Jewish Mass Meeting Committee, which by this letter, request you to give a public discourse,” they concluded.

The pastor acceded and on October 9, 1910 gave a talk titled “Zionism in Prophecy” before an audience of about 4,000 Jews at the Hippodrome, New York’s largest and finest auditorium at the time.

The New York American reported on that day. “The unusual spectacle of 4,000 Hebrews enthusiastically applauding a Gentile preacher, after having listened to a sermon he addressed to them concerning their own religion, where Pastor Russell, the famous head of the Brooklyn Tabernacle, conducted a most unusual service. It was not long before all reserve, and all possible doubt of Pastor Russell’s entire sincerity and friendliness were worn away. Then the mention of the name of a great leader [Herzl] who, the speaker declared, had been raised by God for the cause — brought a burst of applause.”

Russell held similar mass meetings in Chicago, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Kansas City, and Cincinnati. In England he addressed 4,600 Jews in London’s Royal Albert Hall, following which he appeared in Glasgow and Manchester, then gave talks in other European cities with large Jewish populations, including Vienna, Berlin, Krakow, and Budapest.

Make no mistake, his speeches got a mixed reception. After Russell had left one meeting, three Jewish groups got into such a row that 46 policemen were called to disperse them. A Jewish rabbi in New York who fiercely opposed Russell influenced his associates in Austria-Hungary to resist plans for meetings addressing Jews.

However, the Herzl Year Book provides statistics of the printed preaching on the subject of Judaism and Zionism, which appeared in 107,000 copies of Anglo-Jewish newspapers and weeklies, and in 650,000 copies of the Yiddish Press. Russell even published a Yiddish-language paper of his own, Die Shtimme — “the voice.”

Separate Covenants 

Why would a devout Christian minister invest so much in advocating the idea of a national homeland for the Jews?

In May 26, 1911, Jacob De Haas, editor of the Boston Jewish Advocate and a personal confidant of Herzl, published an article in the Jewish Advocate praising Russell as a Philo-semite with no desire to convert the Jews.

But question of Russell’s motivation doesn’t lead to philo-Semitism necessarily: rather it goes to the prophecies of restoration delivered to ancient Israel by prophets in the Bible (Jeremiah 30:18, 31:8-10, Amos 9:14,15, Romans 22:25,26).

For example, “And I will bring again the captivity of my people of Israel, and they shall build the waste cities, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and drink the wine thereof; they shall also make gardens, and eat the fruit of them” (Amos 9:14). Russell was confident that these verses would be fulfilled and that God would restore the Jews to Palestine. In November 1892 he wrote in Zion’s Watch Tower: “There are now in the world more than ten million Jews, about three-quarters of whom are in Russia, Poland, the Balkan States, and Turkey. If the movement toward Palestine should get the impulse that the Hirsch committee is able to give it, an imaginative person can conceive of the country’s doubling or trebling its Jewish population before the close of our century, and of its having a larger Jewish population fifty years hence than it had in ancient times, when its census ran up to three millions. Should the restoration be accomplished, all hail to the New Jerusalem!”

He also believed that God had a separate covenant with the Jews and a different covenant with Christians, writing in the Watch Tower, in January 1909, page 28: The more closely we investigate the New Covenant, the more we must be convinced of this fact — that it belongs to Israel alone.”

These were the sentiments on which Russell’s advocacy of Zionism was based. While he may not have lived to see the fulfillment of his wishes, his legacy continued. He died in 1916.

 In 1925, his successor Judge Joseph F. Rutherford wrote the book Comfort for the Jews. Rutherford is rather more renowned for founding Jehovah’s Witnesses, a religious group that emerged from Russell’s Bible Student Movement.

Before Russell, no Anglo-Jewish newspapers or Yiddish press had carried articles by a Christian minister. When he died on October 31, 1916, the Herzl Year Book observed: “Russell himself, according to the testimony of the American Jewish Press from the years 1910 to 1916, maintained excellent and friendly relations with the leaders of American Jewry to his last days.”

Publishers Note:

Charles Taze Russell started Zion’s Watch Tower in 1879 and always warmly encouraged the Jewish people to lay hold of the prophecies about their destined role in God’s Kingdom. After the passing of Pastor Russell, his successor adopted a different view. Members of the Bible Student movement, however, remain as Christian Zionists and supporters of Israel, continuing the legacy of Pastor Russell. For more information, please visit: www.bsaif.org/BS.Zionism.pdf

Friday, July 17, 2020

The first 5 presidents of the Mormon church were all Freemasons




The first 5 presidents of the Mormon church were all Freemasons.

Mormonism and Freemasonry

by Terry Chateau
Grand Lodge of British Colombia and Yukon


The first five Presidents of the Church, Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, John Taylor, Wilford Woodruff, and Lorenzo Snow, were all made Masons in Nauvoo Lodge. Also practically every member of the Hiearchy was or became a freemason shortly after the Prophet was raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason.

Yes, Joseph Smith's father was a Freemason



Some people debate as to whether Joseph Smith Senior was a Freemason or not. According to the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, Joseph Smith Sr. became a Mason on May 7th, 1818 in Ontario Lodge no. 23 in Canandaiugua, New York.


Mormonism and Freemasonry

by Terry Chateau
Grand Lodge of British Colombia and Yukon


The Joseph Smith family was known and acknowledged to have been a close-knit one, where strong individual affection and loyalty existed between each of the members. It was a masonic family which lived by and practiced the estimable and admirable tenets of Freemasonry.
The father, Joseph Smith Sr. was a documented member of the craft in upstate New York. He was raised to the degree of Master Mason May 7, 1818 in Ontario Lodge No. 23 of Canandaigua, New York.
An older son, Hyrum Smith was a member of Mount Moriah Lodge No. 112 at Palmyra, New York. Numerous attempts have been made to prove that Joseph Smith and his family were depraved, degenerate, and disreputable persons. These documented facts, namely, the masonic membership of Joseph Smith Sr. in the Lodge in Canandaigua, and Hyrum’s membership in Palmyra’s lodge, are of the most significant importance. Being the elite institution it was recognized by the public to be at that time, and their active membership in two of the masonic lodges of the area is convincing evidence of the stature and high esteem the members of the family enjoyed in the eyes and opinions of those who knew them best.

Be Wise As Serpents - Table of Contents

See My Brother Blog But Harmless As Doves 7th Day Adventism, Anti-Masonry & Nazism www.ButHarmlessAsDoves.blogspot.com PLEASE SUPP...